1) “I only wish Michael would have been here to see these tributes. The media (and America) rejected Michael, and that’s horrible. We should be ashamed of all these celebrations.”
First of all, if there was ever a man who did himself in, it was Michael Jackson. He had more money than anyone else in entertainment, and used it to…well, I’m not going to recount everything he decided to spend his money on, because we’ve all heard the stories. For example, he tried to purchase the bones of the Elephant Man. He did this after leaking the story to the press, and then denied it afterwards. This is post-superstardom MJ in a nutshell: Confusing, weird, and just a little bit evil.
Second of all, NOBODY accused of pedophelia is EVER forgiven by America or the Media. Why should Michael Jackson be any different from the dentists and rabbis who Chris Hansen so vexes on To Catch a Predator? Even if he didn’t molest kids, it sure looked like he did. I mean, he had an elaborate system of alarms on his ranch to make sure that nobody could ever sneak up on him when he was alone with boys. You don’t do that unless you’re hiding something. Of course, we may never know what that something was — it’s either pedophilia, or something else weird enough to ruin his already sketchy reputation. Either way, Al Sharpton expressing (fake and grandstanding-related) sadness over our treatment of the man — after we gave him all that money and he repaid us with a steady stream of antisocial behavior, lies, isolation, and increasingly crappy music — is more than a little ludicrous. We didn’t move to the UAE, he did.
2) “How can you people be celebrating the life of a pedophile? We should be ashamed of all these celebrations.”
Michael Jackson, before he sat out on the counter too long and got weird, was maybe the most talented entertainer in the history of music. Those kind of people get celebrated, no matter what they do later in life. As much as we can’t forgive a pedophile (even one who was found not guilty, then paid hush money to those who brought the charges against him), we can’t forget the best selling album in the history of the world. Not only that, but people over 40 or so remember Michael as this sweet hypertalented little kid who was the star of the Jackson 5. It’s only natural that people would remember how his music touched their lives. It doesn’t mean that America is suddenly unconcerned with pedophilia (although at the rate things are going, that domino might be falling here pretty soon), it means the MJ was singularly awesome.
3) “As an African-American, I love Michael Jackson. He was one of us. He made it possible for us to be on MTV.”
It feels a little weird to say because I’m a white guy, but wasn’t the whole deal with latter-day Michael that he wanted to transcend race and gender and age and any other sort of label? Wasn’t that what “Black or White” was about? Is this (probably admirable) goal of his appreciated and endorsed by the average African-American? Or is it conveniently forgotten, along with his white “children” and his trial and everything else?
I understand older black americans appreciating Michael Jackson absolutely exploding any remaining racial barriers to musical success, but why are black 20-somethings so attached to him? Is it the influence of their parents? Is it MTV or BET? I don’t know, but it bothers me. Unquestioned loyalty in the face of a heck of a lot of questions bothers me.
Michael Jackson is complicated, perhaps more complicated than any other public figure in America. Can we all agree on that? Can we all agree to be a little double-minded about the guy, or at least stop grandstanding for only one side? Thanks.



Mike Pape is a freelance writer and computer technician living in Irving, TX. He has too much to do. Give him a break, please.
